Author Archives: simonr

Free training in Liverpool – what’s not to love? :)

Free Training for guinea pigs

Free training for guinea pigs in Liverpool

We’re developing some new courses here at Aware Plus. One of then – communication skills – is ready to go.

Almost.

We need to check it’s as ready as we think it is.

So here’s the deal. If you – or anyone you think is going to benefit – can be in central Liverpool on March 11 for a free day’s training, get in touch.

You get a day’s free training and we get feedback on the course before it goes live to paying clients. Fair deal?

Thoughts from a cafe…. ;)

“Soft skills – ahhhhh, wish I could take time to learn the easy stuff: I’ve got too much to do, just with my real job!”

If we had a couple of quid for every time I’d heard that, or something like it, we’d barely have to work every again.

The thing is though, it misses the point.

In today’s world it’s not a question of “the real job plus…” because the soft skills are the real job.

Technical skills alone don’t cut it. Technical skills alone don’t differentiate you from the competition. Technical skills these days are taken as a starting point. They’re the baseline, they’re a given.

These days the differentiator is the so-called ‘soft skills’.

Make no mistake, by the way, soft skills are hard – but that’s a different issue, perhaps.

Think about it… if there are two people in front of you and both of them can do their job, which of them are you going to pick? The one who can talk about his job, too, of course.  And if everyone can do the job but only one of them can talk about it?

You get the idea, I’m sure.

(By the way, I’m not alone in this thought: the erudite Mind Tools site has a similar, but more in-detail post.)

So what’s the point? The point is that anyone who wants to get on in their job – particularly if that job isn’t simple repetitive/mechanical work – needs to up their game. The kinds of training you need to do your job aren’t the kinds of tools you need in management and leadership.

What got you here won’t get you there.

That means you need to get your soft skills up to spec.. .and the less you agree, the more you need to! 😉

The speed of training.

I’ve been prompted to write this by a feedback form (only 23/25, shock horror!) that suggested the the content, the materia, the most important bit of our training, could have been delivered in an hour less.

They’re right, it could have been.

Instead of finishing at half past four, we could have delivered the material more quickly and finished at half past three in the afternoon. It would certainly have been easier for us (we’d have avoided bad travel conditions) and very popular amongst the people on the course.

And it wasn’t as if we didn’t know this before we started (hey, we’re expert trainers after all!).

So why didn’t we? Why didn’t we go for the easy hit?

Because training it’s not about what we say, it’s about what people hear. It’s not about how fast we can deliver material, it’s about how fast people can receive that material. It’s not about how short a time we can make it take to get information into people’s heads – it’s about how long a time we can make it stay there!

By taking that extra hour over the day, we had time for what we call ’embedding exercises’.

Training is only effective if it sticks – if people can not only receive it, absorb it and recall it – but only if they can then apply it. By allowing time for reflection and for having a go, for things like looking at case studies and discussing personal circumstances, we make it much (much!) more likely that what we train people in can and will be applied…

…that it will be used to make a difference in the real world.

For us, it’s all about use, not convenience.

Seth Godin is almost a genius

Well, okay, he is. At what he does he’s one of the best. So when he writes that

True professionals don’t fear amateurs

we’re going to shut up, sit down, and read.

He’s right, of course.  The better you are at whatever you do, the more comfortable you are (and the more you enjoy) working with gifted and talented amateurs in the same area. They’re no threat, business-wise, and it’s a lot of fun bringing on someone who is enthusiastic.

But here’s the rub. Sometimes an amateur, no matter how well intentioned, is dangerous. You’d not want an amateur heart surgeon, I’m guessing. And how about the brakes on your car – done by a professional?  Probably.

Training is similar. Amateur trainers aren’t neutral, they’re potentially, positively dangerous. It’s something I’ve ranted about before – both in passing on this very blog (Training checklists) and over on our presentation skills blog (presentation bullshit) as well as in a couple of guest blogs in various places.

The difference about when amateurs are to be encouraged or looked at with a raised eyebrow lies, it seems to me, in when third parties are involved. A talented amateur cook will probably only poison his or her own family, I’d guess. A talented amateur trainer can screw up an awful lot of people’s working lives at a time.

The thing is, being a talented amateur is great whenever things aren’t going wrong – that is, if the person you’re training learns needs things doing in the same way as you… but what happens if it doesn’t work. You’r stuck.

Worse, so is your client.

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail

If you’re a giften amateur, chances are that you’re damned good with that hammer. Good for you – and I’ll willingly, happily help you all I can. But if it needs a screwdriver and all you’ve got is a hammer I can’t let you anywhere near my clients.

Training people is easy. Training people well is hard.

How to pick a training company. (Preferably us!)

Let’s face it, it’s hard to know one training company from another, just by looking at their website. None of them is going to say “We’re not very good at this”.  Everyone is going to claim to be the best there is at what they do.

(As an aside, I can’t prove we’re the best there is any more than anyone else can, but we’ve got the evidence that we’re pretty darn good! 🙂 )

The thing is, there are some things which are probably at least as important as the quality of the training company and the training they deliver – but which doesn’t get a look-in during a lot of decisions about which company to use…

… fit.

What’s fit?

Fit is the interaction between you and the training company. They might be absolutely brilliant trainers but (like in anything) different training companies do the same thing in different ways – or do things which look at sound the same but are subtly different in ways that are profound enough to change your experience of their training.

Now, obviously it’s in no one’s interest to hire us if they aren’t going to like us…  so with that in mind, enjoy the show! 🙂

Training checklists…

Readers of our other blogs will know that we’re not too keen on what we call WIKI-trainers. That is, trainers who know something about their subject but not about training. The risk is that they shoe-horn their trainees into ‘their’ way of doing things, whether or not it’s the right way for their client.

However, in the real world, I recognise that all too often people are cornered into doing some internal training at work by their boss. With that in mind, I hope this checklist proves useful… it’s not comprehensive, of course (no list could be) but it might be handy for the ‘occasional presenter/trainer’ for things to have checked before they start.

What other stuff do you check before you start training? 🙂

MBTI for UNN

(or, how many acronyms can you fit into one blog title?)

Just a quick brag, really! 🙂   We’ve just been asked if we can do an MBIT psychometric profile for every single one (yes, really!) of the leadership team at the University of Northumbria at Newcastle (UNN).

Looks like we can probably afford Christmas after all 🙂

Soft skills as a marginal advantage – tales from the Olympics

Victoria Penbleton

Victoria Penbleton

Back in the summer (remember that?) Britain was a very cool place to be. Not only were we hosting the Olympics but we were hosting them very well.

On top of that, we were doing well in the competition elements too – and no where more so than in cycling.  So what was it that made our cycling team so very successful?

It’s been widely reported (here, for example) that there was no one simple, single ‘magic bullet’ but instead the success was the result of the accumulation of a lot of little things – of what was called ‘Marginal Gains’.  A lot of them were simple common-sense things but they all added together, incrementally to mean we had a very high-performing team.

Wheels which give a two percent increase give a two percent increase: but wheels which give a two percent increase on another two percent increase from (say) a different saddle give a much, much bigger margin of improvement – obviously!

So it is with the soft skills of things like presentations training, time management, stress management and client relationship training. They’re not killer blows that flatten your opposition – instead they’re part of a subtle, incremental approach. Put together, they’ll make you better at what you do – and better than the other guys, too! 🙂

Let’s say you’re about neck-and-neck with another job candidate in terms of, say, how well you write your computer code… but you can talk about it and explain what you’re doing a little bit better than him/her… or perhaps your time management is fractionally better so you’re 5% more productive… you get the picture.

And to shift scale from the individual to the organisation, the same thing applies. If you’re customer service team is five percent better than the opposition’s and your staff are five percent happier (and therefor more productive) and there are fewer off with stress because you’ve provided training in how to cope with pressure… well… you get the idea, I’m sure.

In other words – just because soft skills are subtle (and it’s very hard to measure their impact directly) it doesn’t mean they’re not the thing that turns you from an Olympic finalist to and Olympic medalist, so to speak.

Meeting rooms are not training rooms…

… and visa versa!meeting room - not the one I'm talking aobut! :)

I’m sitting here, waiting for a client in a venue in the middle of town (or toon as the native  Geordies say it) in one of the nicest meeting rooms I’ve ever seen.  For a start there’s free tea and coffee and (impressively!) a very large supply of chocolate chip cookies in the middle of the table.

It’s clean and warm and the reception staff were very helpful and friendly.

But despite all these wonderful things my heart sank as I walked in. Why? Because it’s a wonderful meeting room – and I’m here to do training.

What’s the difference, in terms of room layout and facilities?  Well facility-wise not much, I suppose. Fast wifi would be appreciated for both activities, decent soundproofing too… along with reasonably comfortable heating and air conditioning!

But in a training room, at least the kind of training I need to use today, there’s a fundamental problem.

In a meeting room everyone needs to be able to see everyone else. In a training room, everyone needs to be able to see the trainer (as well as everyone else!).

In a typical meeting room the layout might be, say, a dozen chairs around an oval table, which is exactly what I’ve got here. Putting a flipchart of a screen at one end immediately means that three people at one end have to turn their necks 180 degrees. Preferably they should move, so that they’re not blocking anyone else’s view.

Adding to that is the lack of space around the table. Even if the three head-turners move, where are they going to move to? The table was full already. What’s more, the next two or three people down the table may very well find that they’re unpleasantly, uncomfortably close to the trainer and his or her material, be that flip charts or slides etc.  The problem is compounded, of course, for the approximately 50% of the population who are Introverts!

If people aren’t comfortable in their learning environment, they don’t learn as well – it’s as simple as that!

So what things should a training room have that a simple meeting room needn’t?

  • Space – space for people to get far enough away from the screen or whatever, so that they’re not overwhelmed by it. A lot of venues simply put a laptop on the end of a boardroom table, point it at a white bit of wall and call it a training room!
  • Individual lighting control – no one wants to sit in the dark for an hour at a time and yet all too often that’s the only way to be able to see slides! The whole room is dark or the whole room is light. Training rooms need to be able to dim the lights near the screen only.
  • Screen – speaking of screen, training rooms need somewhere to show slides (you may not want to use them – I often don’t – but the option needs to be there). Taking pictures off the wall to create a blank space doesn’t qualify, sorry!
  • Speakers – let’s face it, if the trainer is going to show video (and why shouldn’t they?!) you’re going to need to play the audio. Speakers built into laptops and/or data projectors just don’t cut it. Sorry guys – you need a proper system.
  • Flipchart – (or a whiteboard at least) There are times when a bit of interactivity is what’s needed and flipcharts are ideal for this. Whiteboards are fine, but with a flipchart you can keep the stuff you scribble and refer back to it at any part later in your work. Speaking of which, some way of displaying flipchart sheets is nice – my favorite way is a thin corkboard around the room about six feet off the ground so that I can pin the tops of sheets of flipchart paper to it around the room
  • Chairs – chairs are designed ‘by the hour’. That is, manufacturers recognise the trade-off between the cost of the chair and how long you can sit in it, comfortably. Meeting rooms tend to be equipped (sensibly) with two-hour chairs or (possibly) even one-hour chairs. Meetings don’t often run longer than this… but training does. Three or six hour training sessions (with breaks, obviously!) aren’t uncommon and a one-hour char in a three our session is just asking for trouble.

So there you go – I’m sure we’ve missed things on this list… these are just the things that occurred to us immediately. And don’t get us started on the meeting room which masqueraded as a training room but then made the situation worse by the host saying “I’m afraid we’ve had a bit of a flood over the weekend – the smell should go by lunchtime – but I’m afraid the electricity supply won’t be back until tomorrow at the earliest.”

Sigh…..

Open Space

Ever heard of it? No? Try here for an explanation from a Canadian OST guy… 🙂

Basically it’s a way of making meetings happen so that they deliver what the people in the room need – not necessarily what the agenda says they want… and it’s a new string to our bow. New member Lydia Bates (okay, bios to follow, we promise!) joined with Northumbria University to run a whopper of an open space session just last Friday.

The image, by the way, is one of the sessions after lunch (and thanks to everyone for permission to use it!).

How did it go?

“Gosh, it wasn’t what we expected… but it was exactly what we needed.” Personally, I’ll settle for that! 🙂