I didn’t start as a trainer and presenter. Oh no. Once upon a time I had a real job – I was a researcher at a university. My PhD looked at the environmental causes of childhood leukaemias and I then spent over 24 years in research. Overall, I loved it.
At times, of course, I hated it, like when I’m up at two o’clock in a Sunday morning and still don’t understand why the damned data won’t fit the model… but that’s the same for any job, I guess.
And then there were the contracts I worked on and the people we did the research for. We only took contracts that we felt were socially worthwhile – lots of them for central government, to help them better do what they needed to do. For example, a lot of my time was spent drawing maps to help better target support to deprived households. But after about 20 years I realised that I was tending to work on the same sorts of issues again and re-inventing the wheel.
I realised people often didn’t need more research on a topic, they just needed to act on the research that had already been done, so…
The data was different but the issues were the same. Nothing had changed – not because people didn’t know what they needed to do to make the world a better place, but because they simply hadn’t acted on that information.
…that was the time I got interested in looking at the communication of science…
Alongside that were the conferences, where I’d sit and listen to the most brilliant research-minds in the country (and the world explain) their results. Or rather, fail to explain their results. I often came out of a session with no more understanding of an issue than I’d started with – and it wasn’t because I’m stupid. (I’ve got a PhD and a mother that say differently, although my wife and children aren’t too sure!) It was because the presentations were, frankly, sometimes awful.
… and that was when I got interested in presentations, in particular.
The rest is history. For personal reasons I felt the need to move on from research and I simply put two and two together, deciding to train people in how better to make presentations – so that
- people understood what they were saying; and then
- people acted on that information.
So far, it’s been fun… better than working for a living, at least! ;)
There are simple, scientifically researched principles to both of those things: all presenters have to do is stick to them. Unlike a lot of my original research, it’s not rocket science. :)

Hi Simon,
That makes sense to me, from ‘presenting science’ to the ‘science of presenting’. I am planning to do some professional presenting(!) in the future and have joined a local Speakers Group…so I may need to come to you for some advice.
Tony
Hi Tony – don’t forget to check out lots of different speakers groups. Not all of them are any good and they all have a different “feel”.
For example, the strength of Toastmasters is that you’ll get feedback from your peers. The weakness is that you’ll get feedback from you peers – not experts.
Thanks Simon, I was invited to an ASC event – I didn’t know such a thing even existed. There is also a Toastmaster group locally, but they seem to be similar, anecdotally. The more senior guys seem to carry out the reviews (evaluations) where i’ve landed. It all seems very structured but there is a bit of friendly banter and a lot of peer support. I think I will stay where I am for now.
Tony
Hi Tony – my first rule for presenting – Whatever Works, Works – seems to be applicable here… :) If it’s working for you, then that’s where you should be! :)